Welcome Guest. Please Login or Register. Jul 29, 2010, 8:09pm
Note: All participants are expected to abide by the Honor Code. Project Aon and those individuals it represents are not responsible for the content of the messages in this forum nor do they endorse any products advertised herein.
Only registered users can post to this forum. We apologize for the inconvenience.
Joined: May 2006 Gender: Male Posts: 316 Location: Texas, USA
Shamath's riddle (DoIxia) « Thread Started on Aug 31, 2006, 3:16pm »
Just my 2 cents on the unsolveable riddle: I don't think it's a mistake in the text. Instead, it's impossible on purpose, the point being to demonstrate the vast superiority of a demon's intellect over any mortal's, including Lone Wolf's. Though impossible for us to solve with our feeble human minds, a being like Shamath could answer such a question (as she boasts beforehand).
If this is true, then why does an actual answer exist ? If the intention was to pose an unsolvable riddle, no paragraph in the book would have been a correct solution, forcing even cheaters to fight Shamath.
Because there is an answer, but mortals lack the ability to figure it out. It's analogous to me asking you to guess the number I'm thinking of. I am thinking of a number (137), so there is a right answer, but you could only find it by guessing.
PS. I kinda didn't answer your question. I think Joe put an answer in the text to make Shamath's contest genuine, if not exactly fair. He probably wanted the contest to be impossible because players couldn't figure out the answer, not because Shamath posed a bogus question with no answer.
Re: Shamath's riddle (DoIxia) « Reply #6 on May 8, 2007, 1:21pm »
i hate to bump such an old thread, but i've been going back through the books here on PA. I just hit Shamath's Riddle in LoV and honestly, I personally believe it's a missing line.
Who starts a riddle with "'In addition to the loyal servants, there are two Dwellers of the Abyss.'" In addition to WHAT loyal servants? You didn't tell us about them.
I would think the sentence "While preparing for Naar's work I had with me 22 loyal servants." would fit perfectly. Then you can actually perform calculations on it!
"While preparing for Naar's work I had with me 22 loyal servants." 22 (LS)
'In addition to the loyal servants, there are two Dwellers of the Abyss.' 22 (LS) + 2 (DotA) = 24 minions
'When the loyal servants and the Dwellers of the Abyss were counted together, their total number was doubled when my Lieutenants of Night arrived.' 24 minions + 24 (LoN) = 48 minions
'But when my Lieutenants of Night arrived, the Dwellers of the Abyss had to leave.' 48 minions - 2 DoA = 46 minions (24 LoN, 22 LS)
'Exactly half of the remaining number also departed, for they were beholden to the Dwellers.' 46 minions - (22LS / 2) = 35 minions (24 LoN, 11 LS)
'From the remainder I picked the loyal servants to guard my throne of power. I chose them all, except for one who was known to me as a traitor. I executed the traitor before I set my loyal servants to guard my throne.' 11 LS - 1 traitor = 10 LS guarding the throne!
Since the loyal servants are distinguished from the LoN and DotA I wouldn't count them in losing half.
I always think of the riddle posing people as thinking they are way smarter than they are. Shamath obviously thinks little of you and poses a riddle fairly easily solveable, thinking you'd never get it with your puny intellect. Of course, being the brilliant thinker you are, you get it, shocking the Demon Mistress used to dealing with lesser mortals
One would think this would have been covered in a newsletter at some point with Joe Dever giving us some kind of clue, but maybe he doesn't mind the mistake since it's fueled so much discussion and angst all over the Lone Wolf boards
Joined: Feb 2006 Gender: Male Posts: 975 Location: Virginia, USA
Re: Shamath's riddle (DoIxia) « Reply #7 on May 9, 2007, 7:04pm »
I often wonder how Joe thought up these riddles. I can't think of a riddle to save my accursed soul. How the hell does he do it?? Do you think he reads a riddle, then thinks 'Now how can I add this to the Lone Wolf sagas...."? Maybe he changes the words a bit, so we don't know the riddles...?
"Mondego is the one who pulled the trigger! He'd never confess in a million years!" "You're right. But you just did." - The Count of Monte Cristo (2002)
Joined: Oct 2004 Gender: Female Posts: 2,538 Location: Daziarn Plane
Re: Shamath's riddle (DoIxia) « Reply #8 on May 10, 2007, 3:33am »
The only logic puzzle I ever came up with was that Alice in Wonderland one floating somewhere around the site. Other times I just adapt other puzzles to my needs.
And here's my favourite riddle, see if you can get it without googling:
With potent, flowery words speak I, Of something common, vulgar, dry; I weave webs of pedantic prose, In effort to befuddle those, Who think I wile time away, In lofty things, above all day The common kind that linger where Monadic beings live and fare; Practical I may not be, But life, it seems, is full of me!
outspaced Grand Master (Global Moderator) member is offline
And the Yellow God forever gazes down
Joined: Apr 2004 Gender: Male Posts: 2,150 Location: The Midlands, UK
Re: Shamath's riddle (DoIxia) « Reply #10 on May 10, 2007, 8:57am »
Quote:
i hate to bump such an old thread, but i've been going back through the books here on PA. I just hit Shamath's Riddle in LoV and honestly, I personally believe it's a missing line.
Hi Kylinee
I've added a link to this thread to the errata page for The Legacy of Vashna Section 189. When it comes time to review that book, your comments will certainly be taken into consideration, since they potentially make an impossible riddle solvable. Thanks!
I came here to drink milk and kick ass. And I've just finished my milk.--Maurice Moss
skarnivorous Kai Master (Moderator) member is offline
Joined: Oct 2005 Gender: Male Posts: 45
Re: Shamath's riddle (DoIxia) « Reply #11 on May 10, 2007, 9:39am »
Is there perhaps a reference to the number of Leuitenants Shamath has elsewhere in the book?
It's a moot point maybe, but if someone can show Lone Wolf might know there are 12 LotN then solving: Double(LS + 2DOA) = LS + 2DOA + 12LotN gives 2*LS + 4DOA = LS + 2DOA + 12LotN LS + 2DOA = 12LotN LS = 12 LotN - 2DOA = 10
Though having this knowledge would mean Lone Wolf only needs to know the first line or two of the riddle to solve it.
« Last Edit: May 10, 2007, 9:49am by skarnivorous »
skarnivorous Kai Master (Moderator) member is offline
Joined: Oct 2005 Gender: Male Posts: 45
Re: Shamath's riddle (DoIxia) « Reply #13 on May 11, 2007, 11:02pm »
If you follow the path where you DONT know the answer to the riddle, a few page turns on, you find a description of shamath being given armour at her throne. There are two possible number references her, the first is that '12 powerful warriors stand at the base of her throne', now....if these are the LS, then there is 2 too many. However going with my deduction that LW may be able to know there are 12 LOTN, and then here 12 warriors are described as being present, I think we can assume these 12 are the LOTN. Maybe not in this book perhaps Lone Wolf can come across this 'lore' that there is 12 LOTN, making Shamaths riddle not just a test of intelligence, but of knowledge and memory??
The possibility has as much credence I think as any other, but I like it particularly because of the description of the 12 warriors on later pages, it appears this number is not coincedental.
The only logic puzzle I ever came up with was that Alice in Wonderland one floating somewhere around the site. Other times I just adapt other puzzles to my needs.
And here's my favourite riddle, see if you can get it without googling:
With potent, flowery words speak I, Of something common, vulgar, dry; I weave webs of pedantic prose, In effort to befuddle those, Who think I wile time away, In lofty things, above all day The common kind that linger where Monadic beings live and fare; Practical I may not be, But life, it seems, is full of me!
Note: All participants are expected to abide by the Honor Code. Project Aon and those individuals it represents are not responsible for the content of the messages in this forum nor do they endorse any products advertised herein.